Regarding any possible concerns voiced by Compton voters about the ACCOUNTABILITY of an elected City Attorney in Compton, we would emphasize the following points to support the argument for an elected position:
*** Direct Accountability to Voters:
Electing the City Attorney rather than appointing them ensures that the position is directly accountable to the residents of Compton. This structure enables the public to assess the City Attorney’s performance at the ballot box, providing residents with a direct voice in their local government. If residents are unsatisfied with the attorney’s impact on key issues—such as prosecuting ordinance violations, addressing quality-of-life concerns, or advising the council—they can choose a new candidate who better aligns with their expectations and priorities every four years.
*** Checks and Balances:
When the City Attorney is elected rather than appointed by city officials, it strengthens the independence of the role. An appointed City Attorney might feel pressured to align with the preferences of the city council or city manager, especially if their position depends on their favor. Electing the attorney ensures they can act in the best interests of residents without undue influence, preserving an important check on other city powers and enhancing transparency in legal decisions that affect the community.
*** Opportunities for Improvement:
The role of City Attorney in Compton can be enhanced by developing clearer metrics of success that are visible to the public, such as reports on cases prosecuted, ordinances advised upon, and other measurable contributions to the city’s legal framework. By electing a City Attorney, Compton residents maintain the option to select candidates who commit to specific goals, whether that’s improving quality-of-life law enforcement or advancing policies aligned with Transformative Justice principles.
*** Long-Term Commitment:
While an election cycle does create a four-year term for accountability, it also provides the stability needed to implement long-term changes, especially for complex issues like street trafficking or reducing financial mismanagement. By electing a City Attorney, Compton gains a candidate who is empowered to commit to these longer-term goals without the risk of being removed prematurely due to political disagreements. This stability can benefit the city’s progress on challenging, systemic issues.
*** Financial Oversight and Performance Standards:
To address the concerns about financial mismanagement and the efficient use of taxpayer dollars, an elected City Attorney could play a significant role by establishing a record of consistent, transparent financial reporting and legal compliance that is independently verified. If elected, the attorney is accountable to residents and must justify their performance and contributions to the community’s safety and fiscal health at regular intervals, thus addressing concerns about financial oversight.
*** Resident Empowerment through Voting:
Lastly, allowing residents to elect the City Attorney empowers the community by reinforcing their role in shaping local governance. Residents are more likely to feel invested in their community and its governance when they have the power to choose leaders who embody their values and address their unique concerns.
Comments